• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

PRs can be judges: Forum

BuiKia

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Source
Straits Times
Date
22 Apr 2013

WE THANK Mr Joshua Selvakumar for his letter ("Can PRs be judges?"; last Monday).

The criteria for the appointment of a District Judge are prescribed in the Subordinate Courts Act.

The Singapore Legal Service is responsible for the appointment of candidates as Legal Service Officers (including officers who may be appointed as District Judges).

The position of the Legal Service, which takes reference from the framework of the Public Service, is that candidates who are permanent residents (PRs) of Singapore may be considered for appointments to the Legal Service, where the demand for trained personnel is high.

Jeanne Kuik (Ms)

Director

Singapore Legal Service

Source: Straits Times © Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. Permission required for reproduction.
 

Bigfuck

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
what kind of fuck answer is that?

It is a Kangaroo court. They think writing like that absolves them from all legal liability. For such cases, there are political. public image and legal implications as well as national security ones. Kangaroos and kangaroos like the failed sith lord Yung Pung How who claims to be a mind reader.
 

BuiKia

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
excellent idea to use PRs because if got difficult case just get the PR to do it. If done not well, ask him to fuck off. No useless sinkie judge will be exposed.

PRs also got no liability. So after they screw everyone up, they just pack up and go.

Jeanne Kuik - Director (Singapore Legal Service). Kuik is a local surname?
 
Last edited:

captainxerox

Alfrescian
Loyal
excellent idea to use PRs because if got difficult case just get the PR to do it. If done not well, ask him to fuck off. No useless sinkie judge will be exposed.

PRs also got no liability. So after they screw everyone up, they just pack up and go.

Jeanne Kuik - Director (Singapore Legal Service). Kuik is a local surname?

pr are the worst actually. here and enjoy privileges without responsibilities of citizens. simple example is can buy hdb.
 

WongMengMeng

Alfrescian
Loyal
A foreigner with PR status in Hong Kong has made great contributions to the independence of our rival's judiciary. When he retired recently, a laudatory article appeared in the SCMP. Please see the next post for the article. None of our ball-less Sinkie citizen judges can hold a candle to this Rhodesian in Hong Kong.

In Sinkieland, to be awarded any sort of government medal or even be appointed as senior counsel, you first and foremost need to be ... a SYCHOPHANT. Making decisions against the government, like Justice Michael Hartmann, a Rhodesian with Hong Kong PR status, will only cause you to be "transferred", ahem, I mean demoted aka Michael Khoo.

Having more PR judges is good for Sinkieland, provided of course, Sinkie Immigration does not suka suka revoke PR status like what they did to Captain Ryan Goh. In Hong Kong, if you have PR, your right of abode cannot be revoked. The only ground of revocation is if you are not a Chinese citizen and have not returned to Hong Kong for three consecutive years. Otherwise, even if you said “the Hong Kong government is a crony of PRC” or joined a protest, your PR status is still secure.

On the other hand, Sinkie government’s policy is to grant PRs en-masse to low quality migrants from Third World countries. To these people, Sinkieland is haven compared to their poor and corrupted countries of origin. Do not be fooled by these Jedi mind tricks. Having high quality PRs is good for Sinkieland. If you need to blame anybody for the overcrowding of the Little Red Dot, there is only one entity for you to blame - PAP dominated Sinkie Government.
 

WongMengMeng

Alfrescian
Loyal
Trusted judge who fought for legal integrity of city

Mr Justice Michael Hartmann began his career as a reporter in Africa, and carried his liberal attitudes into the city's highest courtrooms

Mr Justice Michael Hartmann may not be the most publicly visible judge to have served in the High Court but few equal his reputation for handing down rulings that are consistently liberal, except, perhaps, for Mr Justice Kemal Bokhary.

Hartmann was one of the five Court of Final Appeal judges who ruled last month on the right of abode of foreign domestic workers in Hong Kong. While the whole city was waiting for the landmark ruling, Hartmann was the first judge on the panel to make a robust defence of the judiciary.

In last month's issue of Hong Kong Lawyer, published by the Law Society and which came out about two weeks before the ruling, Hartmann said Hong Kong's courts would remain as independent and well-respected as they are now, regardless of what some cynics may say. The following week, Chief Justice Geoffrey Ma Tao-li, speaking at Chinese University, echoed this view and described a "fearless judiciary", which would deliver sound judgments regardless if they were in line with the government's wishes.

When, last Monday, the city's top court delivered its judgment, it refused to entertain the controversial request by the secretary for justice for it to refer to the National People's Congress Standing Committee for an interpretation of the Basic Law.

During his career as a full-time judge between 1991 and his retirement July last year, Hartmann heard numerous Judicial Review cases involving human rights, and on many occasions ruled against the government.

But his passion to uphold the rule of law and to safeguard the constitutional rights of Hong Kong people is unquestionable.

In Hong Kong Lawyer, Hartmann explained why joining the judiciary was the best decision of his life - aside from asking his wife Melanie to marry him. "One of the reasons is the fact that I joined a top-rate institution. One that, in my opinion, has had a critical role to play in Hong Kong's post-1997 prosperity."

In 2006, Hartmann ruled that covert surveillance operations conducted in the city had no valid legal basis. He ruled as unconstitutional a law authorities had relied on for decades to allow phone-tapping, but he gave the government six months to get its house in order.

In a judicial review in 2008, he decided the Broadcasting Authority had restricted freedom of speech when it made a discriminatory ruling against an RTHK television programme about homosexuality.


Another eyebrow-raising decision was his ruling in the Court of First Instance against granting the Independent Commission Against Corruption a warrant to search the newsrooms of seven major newspapers, including the South China Morning Post, in 2004. His written judgment in the case reflected his deep support for upholding freedom of the press.

The ICAC said the search was part of a serious criminal investigation but Hartmann said this was not sufficient to justify the warrant. He also noted a judge had a responsibility to ensure the legal process was not abused by law enforcement agencies because "an application for a search warrant constitutes a serious intrusion upon the freedom of the press".

Although his ruling was later overturned by the Court of Appeal, he gained the admiration of the city's journalists.

Chairwoman of the Journalists Association Mak Yin-ting said Hartmann had adopted a liberal approach in interpreting the law, legal principles and concepts about human rights - the last of which was both important and appropriate. "Instead of narrowly and literally interpreting the law, a constitutional judge should adopt a liberal attitude and a broad approach when the issues deal with human rights or … the rights will not be effectively protected," Mak said.

Hartmann's interest in press freedom is not entirely surprising - early in his career he was a reporter in Rhodesia, now Zimbabwe.

Hartmann was born in Mumbai in 1944 in a British military hospital to an English father and an Australian mother. He finished his education at a boarding school in England then went to university in Southern Rhodesian. He left three years after its independence in 1980.

For the rest of the article, please click:

http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/a...integrity-city
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
academe04.jpg


Even this asshole could be a judge. The bar has already been set very low. It won't be lowered with a non-citizen judge.
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
These are sort of replies and responses that irk the public. Might as well say the following ;

"Please refer to the Subordinate Courts Act" and provide the URL link.
 

WongMengMeng

Alfrescian
Loyal
There is a world of difference between High-level PMETs and ordinary ones. High-level PMETs are scarce the world over. Even Bank of England has to appoint a Canadian as its new head. And it is a good move.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2013/jan/26/mark-carney-bank-england

He got the post thanks to his stellar performance as head of Canada's central bank during the financial crisis. Judges are high-level PMETs. We want the best and preferably those who are not beholden to the PAP. Citizenship is not important.

As for doctors, PRs in this field are mostly from Third World countries and cheap. It is because your lousy PAP gobernment wants to promote Sinkieland as a medical hub for foreigners at the expense of locals. Your CPF, etc are withheld from you. Yet you are forced to put up with low grade Third World doctors imported by your Scums in White. How dumb can Sinkies get.

Judges are paid according to a civil service scale. Doesn't matter whether you are PR or citizen, you get paid the same. It's your work performance that counts. Of course, those who disobey like Michael Khoo will face the consequences. On the other hand, if you are chums with the Old Fart, he will parachute you to be Chief Justice Yong, even tho' most of your life before that you were a Malaysian and a banker! Any unfairness that results is because dumb Sinkies have voted for the PAP for short sighted motives like lift upgrading, prosperity bonus, pui, pui, pui. Sinkies should blame their useless gobernment for importing low level PMETs as PRs, high-level PMETs should be welcomed with open arms and under a points based immigration system.

What the fuck - so many First World countries oredi have points based immigration system - our GROSSLY OVERPAID Ministars cannot learn from others? Fuck the PAP, vote them out in 2016!
 
Last edited:

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
These are sort of replies and responses that irk the public. Might as well say the following ;

"Please refer to the Subordinate Courts Act" and provide the URL link.

These 'corporate communication' replies all follow the same template, with little or no room for deviation. Ms Jeanne Kuik was just doing her job.
 
Last edited:

ChewCheng

Alfrescian
Loyal
Why such questions are being asked? Simply because of this idiot. He is the best example why PR should not be a judge.

When one does not want to be a citizen after a few years, they should just remove him.

National+University+of+Singapore+law+professor+Tey+Tsun+Hang.jpg
 

WongMengMeng

Alfrescian
Loyal
Why such questions are being asked? Simply because of this idiot CHEWCHENG. He is the best example why JiakLiaoBees should be ABORTED at birth, so they do not become a burden to society when they grow up. No more triads in Sinkieland, so they join the PAP triad - the INTERNET BRIGADE. It is an insult that your taxpayers' money are used in this manner. An even greater insult that the Kangaroo judge has no balls to tell the DPP Gym-Ah-Boy not to play to the gallery.

"..... an interesting short summary of trolls with too much time on their hands, and to quote an old proverb,

“An idle mind is the devil’s playground.”

Leo Khaw
Member of TOC’s Editorial Team

A recent Internet expose by the blog Singapore Hall of Shame (who among its articles accuses Professor Tey, the professor charged over the sex-for-grades case, put up false-flag posts under the pseudonym Rumpole in the Sammyboy forums) has brought the Facebook group ‘My Compass’ headed by Jason Chua Chin Seng of Fabrications About The PAP fame into public light.

This is definitely alarming. A group of seemingly one-minded (and some say brainwashed) people controlling public opinion and warping public perception certainly is troublesome for a society progressing towards the ideals of openness and free speech."

See the full article here:

http://www.tremeritus.com/2012/11/20/internet-brigades-and-political-discourse-–-a-revelation/

And this JiakLiaoBee CHEWCHENG posted the rubbish article from Singapore Hall of Shame stock, stock and barrel on Sammyboy on 4th October 2012, a little before the above article on TRE exposing the activities of PAP IBs.

http://sammyboy.com/showthread.php?130398-Prof-Tey-is-Rumpole-in-Sammyboy&highlight=rumpole

Remember this is your TAXPAYERS' MONEY they are abusing. And anyone with a modicum of common sense will know that those photos are not related to the case. Yes, the sofa is not even RED. If your Shit Times CNA can play hard and fast with such simple facts, they can misreport a lot of other things.
 
Last edited:

ChewCheng

Alfrescian
Loyal
LOL! What a joke by someone who tried to hoodwink the people here by creating clones to post arguments to support himself!




Why such questions are being asked? Simply because of this idiot CHEWCHENG. He is the best example why JiakLiaoBees should be ABORTED at birth, so they do not become a burden to society when they grow up. No more triads in Sinkieland, so they join the PAP triad - the INTERNET BRIGADE. It is an insult that your taxpayers' money are used in this manner. An even greater insult that the Kangaroo judge has no balls to tell the DPP Gym-Ah-Boy not to play to the gallery.

"..... an interesting short summary of trolls with too much time on their hands, and to quote an old proverb,

“An idle mind is the devil’s playground.”

Leo Khaw
Member of TOC’s Editorial Team

A recent Internet expose by the blog Singapore Hall of Shame (who among its articles accuses Professor Tey, the professor charged over the sex-for-grades case, put up false-flag posts under the pseudonym Rumpole in the Sammyboy forums) has brought the Facebook group ‘My Compass’ headed by Jason Chua Chin Seng of Fabrications About The PAP fame into public light.

This is definitely alarming. A group of seemingly one-minded (and some say brainwashed) people controlling public opinion and warping public perception certainly is troublesome for a society progressing towards the ideals of openness and free speech."

See the full article here:

http://www.tremeritus.com/2012/11/20/internet-brigades-and-political-discourse-–-a-revelation/

And this JiakLiaoBee CHEWCHENG posted the rubbish article from Singapore Hall of Shame stock, stock and barrel on Sammyboy on 4th October 2012, a little before the above article on TRE exposing the activities of PAP IBs.

http://sammyboy.com/showthread.php?130398-Prof-Tey-is-Rumpole-in-Sammyboy&highlight=rumpole

Remember this is your TAXPAYERS' MONEY they are abusing. And anyone with a modicum of common sense will know that those photos are not related to the case. Yes, the sofa is not even RED. If your Shit Times CNA can play hard and fast with such simple facts, they can misreport a lot of other things.
 

WongMengMeng

Alfrescian
Loyal
LOL! What a joke by someone who tried to hoodwink the people here by creating clones to post arguments to support himself!

Hello JiakLiaoBee, anyone who cares to examine the numerous posts will be able to deduce that Asterix is an effectively bilingual layman in Hong Kong and Rumpole is an Anglophile lawyer with limited knowledge of Chinese and residing in London, whereas I am a lawyer residing in Sinkieland with no knowledge of Chinese. Typical PAP style, lose argument only kow pay kow bu about personal details of the other side. Chen Show Mao is not native born lah. Vincent Wijeysingha's sexual orientation not known lah. All irrelevant to the topic at hand.

http://sammyboy.com/showthread.php?...B-probe-over-exchanging-grades-for-sex/page13

Besides, in the above thread, from post #242 onwards you have tonnes of opportunity to deny that you are a PAP IB and failed to do so. Now, even in this short thread, you did not deny that you are a PAP IB. It is so obvious even an idiot will know. And your English can suddenly change from Ah Beng style to not too bad English - proof that there are several IBs sharing your nick.

So FUCK OFF.
 
Last edited:

ChewCheng

Alfrescian
Loyal
LOL! All 3 write and spell in the same manner?

Exposed to the core and now can only alleged that I'm PAP IB when you are more likely to be one instead.

Tey is a white horse and that is why he is still drawing salary from NUS whereas most people would have already been suspended without pay. Why the special treatment? That is because he has links with the PAP!

That is why you are here to hoodwink us here.

You are in sinkapore? Then take a picture of the view outside your office with your moniker name written on a paper to prove it! Cant right?

Everyone here have the right to post. Can't take it then dun post. CHEW Cheebye!

Hello JiakLiaoBee, anyone who cares to examine the numerous posts will be able to deduce that Asterix is an effectively bilingual layman in Hong Kong and Rumpole is an Anglophile lawyer with limited knowledge of Chinese and residing in London, whereas I am a lawyer residing in Sinkieland with no knowledge of Chinese. Typical PAP style, lose argument only kow pay kow bu about personal details of the other side. Chen Show Mao is not native born lah. Vincent Wijeysingha's sexual orientation not known lah. All irrelevant to the topic at hand.

http://sammyboy.com/showthread.php?...B-probe-over-exchanging-grades-for-sex/page13

Besides, in the above thread, from post #242 onwards you have tonnes of opportunity to deny that you are a PAP IB and failed to do so. Now, even in this short thread, you did not deny that you are a PAP IB. It is so obvious even an idiot will know. And your English can suddenly change from Ah Beng style to not too bad English - proof that there are several IBs sharing your nick.

So FUCK OFF.
 
Top