• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

SCDF Peter Lim Gold Cup

Vinnie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Woman at centre of ex-SCDF chief's corruption trial takes the stand
By Claire Huang | Posted: 18 March 2013 2226 hrs

display_image.php


Ms Pang Chor Mui, the woman at the centre of Peter Lim's corruption trial arrives in court with escorts. (Photo: Lim Wee Leng)

SINGAPORE: The woman at the centre of the corruption trial of the former head of the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF), Peter Lim Sin Pang, told the court that he had called to ask if her company carried radiation portal monitors shortly before a government tender was called.

Fifty-two-year-old Peter Lim is accused of obtaining sexual favour from 49-year-old Mdm Pang, in exchange for advancing her company's - Nimrod Engineering- business interests.

But the prosecution said there are nine parts of Mdm Pang's evidence that are inconsistent with her statements to the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB).

So they have applied to cross-examine their key witness, Mdm Pang.

Such a move by the prosecution usually leads to the impeachment of its witness' credibility.

With impeachment, the judge will have to decide at the close of trial, which evidence and statement to be taken into consideration.

Mdm Pang arrived in court on Monday morning, accompanied by her own escorts.

The mother-of-one recounted how she first met Peter Lim in 1996 at a work conference. She said they kept in contact mostly via what she called "playful" text messages.

When asked to elaborate and give examples, she said she could not recall but described them as "light-hearted banter".

From 2006 to 2009, when Mdm Pang was with Nimrod Engineering, the two met for about three lunches.

At the end of 2009, Nimrod was awarded an SCDF contract, which was not the contract involved in the charge against Lim.

Mdm Pang testified that it was the first SCDF contract the firm had landed since she joined the company in 2006.

When she was told of the project, she sent Lim a "thank you" message.

Mdm Pang said she had sent the message out of courtesy.

She added she did not think Lim would have been involved in approving the S$13,000 contract, which she described as "small".

Previously, the court heard Lim had signed off on the contract.

The divorcee went on to describe her first sexual encounter with Lim in May 2010.

He had been drinking and had called her to give him a lift home as she had previously made such an offer.

The sexual encounter occurred after she sent Lim to his home in Tanjong Rhu.

She parked along a road, which was a short distance away from his condominium, and started chatting with him.

Saying one thing led to another, Mdm Pang said she liked Lim a lot and went on to perform oral sex on him.

The prosecution's case is that Lim tipped off Nimrod Engineering about SCDF's need for walk-through radiation portal monitors (RPMs), even before the information was made public.

SCDF had called for an open tender in April 2011.

The tender was published on the government e-procurement website GeBiz on April 6, 2011.

A few weeks after the March 2011 Fukushima disaster, Mdm Pang said Lim called her up and asked if Nimrod carried any machines that screened radiation.

She asked what he was looking for and Lim said just a basic unit. No other details were given.

Then Mdm Pang instructed her colleague to look for a basic machine.

In late April, she had a discussion with the managing director of Nimrod, Tamil Selvan, who decided to bid for the project.

During the discussion, Mdm Pang said she was reluctant to bid for the project as there were many considerations, such as the maintenance of the machines for 10 years and having to train people to operate the machines.

But as Mr Selvan decided to go for it, Nimrod put in a bid at the eleventh hour.

But Mdm Pang said SCDF cancelled the tender in July and put up another one in November.

The court also heard the prosecution alleging that the affair between Lim and Mdm Pang did not continue, because of her "intimate and non-sexual friendship" with Mr Selvan.

No other detail on this was mentioned in court.

The trial continues.

- CNA/ck


 

Vinnie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Woman at centre of corruption trial first met ex-SCDF chief Peter Lim in 1996


Published on Mar 18, 2013

pangandlime.jpg


Ms Pang Chor Mui, (left), the woman at the centre of a corruption charge against former civil defence chief Peter Lim Sin Pang (right), first met him when he was a major, she said taking the stand for the first time during the sex-for-contracts trial on Monday. -- ST PHOTOS: LIM SIN THAI AND WONG KWAI CHOW

By Tham Yuen-c

The woman at the centre of a corruption charge against former civil defence chief Peter Lim Sin Pang first met him when he was a major, she said taking the stand for the first time during the sex-for-contracts trial on Monday.

The two met in 1996 when Ms Pang Chor Mui was working for a company that sold mass decontamination portals to the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF). Lim, then a major, was invited to attend an exercise in Norway by the product's supplier, and Ms Pang was the company representative who took him and one of his colleagues there.

Replying to Deputy Public Prosecutor Sherlyn Neo's questions on Monday, Ms Pang referred to Lim by his Chinese name, "Sin Pang", and said they had met for lunch a few times after the trip and kept in touch. But in 1998 after her divorce, the two lost contact as she was busy with work and had to take care of her son.

It was only after Lim was appointed SCDF commissioner in 2009, and Ms Pang had joined Nimrod Engineering, that the two re-connected over text messages and met up again. While on the stand, Ms Pang also said she had sent Lim a "thank you" message after Nimrod Engineering won a contract to supply walkthrough and handheld metal detectors to the SCDF in Dec 2009. She said she had sent the message out of courtesy, and did not think Lim would have been involved in approving the "small" contract worth about $13,000.


 

Vinnie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Star witness in ex-SCDF chief trial Peter Lim's corruption trial claims she "liked him a lot"


Published on Mar 18, 2013
5:06 PM

pangchormui18e.jpg


The woman at the centre of the corruption charges against former civil defence chief Peter Lim Sin Pang, Ms Pang Chor Mui (above), 49, said she had performed a sex act on Lim because she "liked him a lot". -- ST PHOTO: WONG KWAI CHOW

By Tham Yuen-c

The woman at the centre of the corruption charges against former civil defence chief Peter Lim Sin Pang said she had performed a sex act on Lim because she "liked him a lot".

Giving her testimony on her first day on the stand on Monday, Ms Pang Chor Mui, 49, said that she was giving Lim a ride home on May 2, 2010, when the two decided to stop for a chat. One thing led to another, and they ended up kissing and hugging. Soon, she was performing oral sex on Lim.

Lim is charged with corruption for obtaining sexual favours from Ms Pang on that night, in exchange for furthering the business interests of her then-employer Nimrod Engineering. She was a general manager there.

But their tryst was cut short, said Ms Pang, because it had dawned on her that they were in a very public place. While on the stand on Monday, Ms Pang revealed that at the time she had the encounter with Lim, she was in an "intimate relationship" with her boss, managing director of Nimrod Engineering. She said that the relationship was non-sexual, and both parties "cared for each other and supported each other'.


 

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Let's see. This case looks clear-cut.

Prosecution will lose. The prosecution now wants to question their own start witness. And the judge told the prosecutor that the manner of her questioning amounts to cross examination and that she should leave it to the defence counsel to do that job.

There are at least three inconsistencies between Pang's statement and her evidence in court.
 

GoldenDragon

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Prosecution will lose. The prosecution now wants to question their own start witness. And the judge told the prosecutor that the manner of her questioning amounts to cross examination and that she should leave it to the defence counsel to do that job.

There are at least three inconsistencies between Pang's statement and her evidence in court.

Even if PL clears this hurdle, 2 more hurdles await him. Though I am hoping he gets an acquittal, like NBG, I am not so hopeful. My hunch is that the prosecution could have chosen to start their case with their weakest. Just a guess.
 

lianbeng

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Lai, Lai...come bet on this case lah....

lianbeng says Peter Lim Sin Pang will walk out a free man just like Ng Boon Gay because Pang Chor Mui's statements are inconsistent twisting n turning like Cecilia Sue! :biggrin:
 

Equalisation

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Lai, Lai...come bet on this case lah....

lianbeng says Peter Lim Sin Pang will walk out a free man just like Ng Boon Gay because Pang Chor Mui's statements are inconsistent twisting n turning like Cecilia Sue! :biggrin:

Disagree.

He will be convicted because he is ugly !:o
 

Vinnie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Prosecution cross-examines Pang following inconsistencies in CPIB statements
By Claire Huang | Posted: 19 March 2013 1109 hrs

pang-031913e.jpg


Ms Pang Chor Mui, the woman at the centre of Peter Lim's corruption trial arrives in court with escorts. (Photo: Lim Wee Leng)

SINGAPORE: The corruption trial of the ex-chief of the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF), Peter Lim, continued on Tuesday with the prosecution cross-examining its key witness, Madam Pang Chor Mui.

The move to question 49-year-old Mdm Pang follows after nine inconsistencies between her statements she gave to the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau and her evidence in court on March 18.

One area was her reasons for performing oral sex on Lim.

On March 18, she told the court she did it because she liked Lim a lot but in her CPIB statement, she said it was because she liked Lim and didn't want to antagonise him as it would not be good for their friendship and "her company's dealings with SCDF".

On Tuesday, as she took the stand for a second day, Mdm Pang also acknowledged that she was in a serious relationship with her boss, the managing director of Nimrod, Tamil Selvan, when she did Lim a sexual favour in May 2010.

She testified on March 18 that she and Mr Selvan had an intimate friendship that was non-sexual.

However on Tuesday, when asked by the prosecution if Mr Selvan was her boyfriend over the past five years, Mdm Pang agreed that he was.

She also admitted that she did not go further with Lim due to her relationship with Mr Selvan.

Another area with inconsistencies revolves around the tender for radiation portal monitors.

On the point that Lim alerted her about the need for the monitors, Mdm Pang testified on Tuesday that the move did not give Nimrod Engineering a head start when the SCDF called for a tender in April 2011.

She also said in court that Lim did not impress upon her the urgent need for the machines.

In her CPIB statement, she said it was the reason why Nimrod was "able to bid for the tender".

In another statement, she said Lim had urgently needed the machines and had asked her to source for them.

On Tuesday, she said it made no difference whether Lim alerted her about the need for the machines as other companies would have asked about them too.

This would mean that Nimrod would have to source for the machines inevitably.

Mdm Pang had previously testified that she did not talk to Lim about providing more information on the products Nimrod had.

In her CPIB statement, she told Lim she could get a staff to furnish him with the data if there is a need to.

An interesting point that came up when it was the defence's turn to cross-examine the witness was that the location listed in the charge against Lim differs from that given in Mdm Pang's evidence.

The defence had questioned Mdm Pang on the events leading to her performing oral sex on Lim.

She said she drove Lim home to his Tanjong Rhu apartment as he has had drinks before that but they wanted to continue chatting and so she drove from the condominium's main entrance to another spot.

When asked if it could have been a carpark, Mdm Pang said she doesn't know the place well but didn't recognise it to be so.

The defence then asked if she had driven to Stadium area instead of along a road as she had testified on March 18.

Mdm Pang firmly said "no way".

She explained she is very familiar with the Stadium area and would have recognised it.

At this point, the defence pointed out to the district judge that the charge against Lim states "a carpark at Stadium Walk".

Lim, 52, is accused of obtaining sexual favour from Mdm Pang in exchange for advancing her company's business interests.

- CNA/fa

 

Vinnie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Sex-For-Contracts Trial: Extracts from court


20130319.174056_20130319-trial.jpg


The New Paper
Tuesday, Mar 19, 2013

There were several moments when Ms Pang Chor Mui lost her cool Monday.

This was especially so when Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) Sherlyn Neo questioned her about the SMSes she had exchanged with Peter Benedict Lim Sin Pang close to midnight on Dec 18 and the early hours of Dec 19, 2011.

Here is an extract of the SMSes, and the exchange between Ms Pang and DPP Neo.

Ms Pang: Oh Sin pang, how I wish...

Lim: ?

Ms Pang: You know...

Lim: Yes I know.

Ms Pang: Yes, thank you. :smile:

Lim: Just let me know when and where.

Ms Pang: Away from here if possible.

Lim: Kind of difficult unless I'm on business trip.

Ms Pang: Do you usually travel alone on business trips?

Lim: Nope.

Ms Pang: Oh dear.

DPP Neo: What did you mean when you said "how I wish"?

Ms Pang: This is what I meant by the playful fun ways we communicate. I said I wished to go to Disneyland since I always wanted to go to Disneyland. So I just said 'I wish', that was all.

DPP Neo: Why did you ask him if he travels alone?

Ms Pang: I just wanted to know if he travels alone on business trips. I have never asked him the question before.

DPP Neo: Then why did you use "oh dear"?

Ms Pang: It's something I always use. It's a habit I have that I always use "oh dear". I'm just vocalising my thoughts. I don't know if you're trying to read so much into these text messages, it doesn't mean anything, ok? Like I said, I'm always saying "oh dear".

DPP Neo: Do you use "oh dear" in a negative or positive sense in reply to a negative or positive kind of response?

Ms Pang: I cannot recall how I felt then but I was just replying text messages. Sometimes I may not use too much thought... If you ask me what's the thought process behind all these messages I feel like I don't know...I can't give you a answer whether it is positive or negative..

DPP Neo: Looking at some messages, when you sent him "you know...", he replied "yes i know". What did this mean?

Ms Pang: I don't know. Sometimes I say "you know", sometimes I don't want to say much. It's a bad habit perhaps. So I just say "you know..." It doesn't have to mean anything at all.

 

Vinnie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Peter Lim's lawyer to cross-examine Pang on day 8 of corruption trial

By Claire Huang | Posted: 20 March 2013 1135 hrs

display_image.php


Ms Pang Chor Mui, the woman at the centre of Peter Lim's corruption trial arrives in court with escorts. (Photo: Lim Wee Leng)

SINGAPORE: The lawyer of ex-SCDF chief Peter Lim will cross-examine the prosecution's key witness, Madam Pang Chor Mui, on Day 8 of Lim's corruption trial on Wednesday.

The focus will be on nine areas of inconsistencies raised by the prosecution.

On Tuesday, the prosecution applied to cross-examine its own witness due to discrepancies between Madam Pang's statements to the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB), and her evidence in court.

One area was her reasons for performing oral sex on Lim.

On Monday, she told the court she did it because she liked Lim a lot.

However, in her CPIB statement, she said it was because she liked Lim and did not want to antagonise him as it would not be good for their friendship and "her company's dealings with SCDF". She later clarified that the CPIB statement was more accurate.

Another area with inconsistencies revolves around the tender for radiation portal monitors.

On the point that Lim alerted her about the need for the monitors, Mdm Pang testified on Tuesday that the move did not give Nimrod Engineering a headstart when the SCDF called for a tender in April 2011.

She also said in court that Lim did not impress upon her the urgent need for the machines. However, in her CPIB statement, she said it was the reason why Nimrod was "able to bid for the tender".

In another statement, she said Lim had urgently needed the machines and had asked her to source for them.

On Tuesday, she said it made no difference whether Lim alerted her about the need for the machines as other companies asked about them as well. This would mean that Nimrod would have to source for the machines inevitably.

Lim, 52, is accused of obtaining sexual favour from Mdm Pang in exchange for advancing her company's business interests.

The prosecution's case is that Lim tipped off Nimrod about SCDF's need for walk-through radiation portal monitors even before the information was made public.

-CNA/ac


 

Vinnie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Inconsistent answers from key witness as Peter Lim's trial continues

By Claire Huang | Posted: 20 March 2013 1532 hrs

display_image.php


Peter Lim (C), leaves the subordinate court for a lunch break with his two lawyers in Singapore on February 18, 2013. (AFP/ROSLAN RAHMAN)

SINGAPORE: The key prosecution witness in the corruption trial of ex-SCDF chief Peter Lim continues to give inconsistent accounts of her reasons for performing oral sex on Lim.

On Wednesday, under cross-examination by the defence lawyer, Madam Pang Chor Mui said there was no truth in her statement to the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) that she performed oral sex on Lim as she did not want to antagonise him.

Previously, she had told the court that she performed oral sex on Lim in May 2010 because she liked him a lot. She then went on to say that what she had said in her CPIB statement was true -- that the sexual encounter happened as she liked Lim a lot and did not want to antagonise him.

However on Wednesday, on her third day in the stand, Mdm Pang said the officer taking her statement had told her that her initial answer -- that she liked Lim a lot -- was the "wrong answer".

She thought about it and decided to add another reason -- that she did not want to antagonise Lim.

Mdm Pang, 49, explained that she "wanted to get out of the place (CPIB)" and so she "just gave an answer".

"I was hoping that I could be released and I was really very tired through all these sessions," she said.

She also maintained that she told the truth in her CPIB statement and that she had not been lying.

Later, when probed further by the prosecution, Mdm Pang said: "I know that if I didn't complete that thing (the CPIB statement recording), I would not be able to leave that place (CPIB)."

Earlier, during cross-examination by the defence, Mdm Pang testified that she did not make any suggestion on the pricing of the bid for SCDF's tender.

On Lim asking if Nimrod Engineering carried walk-through radiation portal monitors, she agreed with the defence that the word she used in her statement to describe this should have been "informed" and not "alerted".

Lim, 52, is accused of obtaining sexual favour from Mdm Pang in exchange for advancing her company's business interests.

The prosecution's case is that Lim tipped off Nimrod about SCDF's need for the machines even before the information was made public.

-CNA/ac

 
Top